Lithuanian vs Norwegian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Norwegian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Lithuanians
Norwegians
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Norwegian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,598,229 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,481,223 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.96%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 27.5% | 55.6% |
| Range | 26.5% | 54.6% |
| Mean | 11.1% | 12.7% |
| Median | 9.8% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Norwegians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.80%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.87%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.96%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |