Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Bolivia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Immigrants from Bolivia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Lithuanians
Immigrants from Bolivia
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Bolivia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,598,229 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,699,026 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.80%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Bolivia |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 27.5% | 29.9% |
| Range | 26.5% | 27.5% |
| Mean | 11.1% | 10.6% |
| Median | 9.8% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Immigrants from Bolivia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.87%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.92%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.96%), and Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.96%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |