Jamaican vs Cuban Family Poverty
COMPARE
Jamaican
Cuban
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Jamaicans
Cubans
11.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Cuban Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,005,969 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 447,916,186 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 4.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jamaican | Cuban |
Minimum | 3.0% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 37.0% | 28.4% |
Range | 34.1% | 26.2% |
Mean | 11.4% | 11.4% |
Median | 10.6% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 12.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans and Cubans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Comanche (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from El Salvador (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Cape Verdean (10.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.81%), Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |