Jamaican vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Family Poverty
COMPARE
Jamaican
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Jamaicans
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
11.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,005,969 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,249,707 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.660 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jamaican | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago |
Minimum | 3.0% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 37.0% | 81.8% |
Range | 34.1% | 80.8% |
Mean | 11.4% | 11.1% |
Median | 10.6% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 11.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Comanche (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from El Salvador (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (11.1%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Cape Verdean (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |