Italian vs Luxembourger Female Poverty
COMPARE
Italian
Luxembourger
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Italians
Luxembourgers
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Italian vs Luxembourger Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 573,632,055 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,645,818 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.19%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Italian | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 19.8% |
| Range | 98.7% | 18.1% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 7.9% |
| Median | 8.5% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Italians and Luxembourgers by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Swedish (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (11.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Iranian (11.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |