Luxembourger vs Shoshone Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Shoshone
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Shoshone
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Shoshone Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,364,483 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206 and weighted average of 20.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,449,019 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130 and weighted average of 25.1%, a difference of 22.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Shoshone |
Minimum | 10.2% | 9.1% |
Maximum | 52.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 41.9% | 90.9% |
Mean | 21.8% | 39.8% |
Median | 20.7% | 30.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 24.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 50.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 25.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 23.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 23.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Honduran (25.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Blackfeet (25.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican (25.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Somali (25.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Congo (25.3%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |