Iranian vs Tongan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iranian
Tongan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Iranians
Tongans
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Tongan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,618,692 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,866,719 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iranian | Tongan |
Minimum | 3.6% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 31.0% | 22.7% |
Range | 27.5% | 17.6% |
Mean | 9.7% | 11.8% |
Median | 9.0% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians and Tongans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and Greek (11.7%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Macedonian (11.8%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |