Iranian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
COMPARE
Iranian
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Iranians
Immigrants from Hong Kong
10.7%
POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,670,706 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,892,762 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 3.2%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iranian | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Minimum | 2.6% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 27.1% | 16.6% |
Range | 24.5% | 15.1% |
Mean | 8.8% | 8.8% |
Median | 8.4% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 10.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Polish (10.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Danish (10.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Greek (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Korea (10.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Bolivia (10.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Lithuanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and Norwegian (10.5%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |