Immigrants from Western Africa vs Burmese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Africa
Burmese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Western Africa
Burmese
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Africa vs Burmese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,238,602 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Africa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.096 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,334,774 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 33.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Western Africa | Burmese |
Minimum | 0.65% | 0.39% |
Maximum | 26.1% | 11.5% |
Range | 25.5% | 11.1% |
Mean | 6.9% | 4.1% |
Median | 6.1% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 5.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Africa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Africa are Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Chickasaw (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Venezuelan (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Sudan | 3.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 5.7% |
Ghanaians | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |