Choctaw vs Chippewa Male Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
Chippewa
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Choctaw
Chippewa
14.4%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Chippewa Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,566,788 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.682 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,985,801 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 1.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 10.4% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 70.2% | 62.5% |
| Range | 59.8% | 57.4% |
| Mean | 22.2% | 22.5% |
| Median | 19.2% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.6% | 29.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Chippewa by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Honduran (14.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Seminole (14.3%, a difference of 0.67%), Somali (14.3%, a difference of 0.88%), African (14.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and Dutch West Indian (14.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are British West Indian (14.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (14.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Grenada (14.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |