Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Israeli Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Israeli
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Israelis
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Israeli Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,320,666 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,686,807 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.397 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 0.48%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Israeli |
Minimum | 7.9% | 5.6% |
Maximum | 59.7% | 32.2% |
Range | 51.9% | 26.6% |
Mean | 25.1% | 16.8% |
Median | 21.7% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.2% | 13.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.7% | 21.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.6% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Israelis by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Colombia (20.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Netherlands (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Chilean (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |