Brazilian vs Israeli Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Israeli
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Israelis
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Israeli Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,523,574 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,686,807 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.397 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 0.99%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Israeli |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 58.7% | 32.2% |
| Range | 54.4% | 26.6% |
| Mean | 22.4% | 16.8% |
| Median | 19.7% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 21.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Israelis by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Chile (20.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.21%), South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Chilean (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |