Immigrants from Chile vs Israeli Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Israeli
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Israelis
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Israeli Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,927,645 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,686,807 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.397 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 1.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Israeli |
Minimum | 1.8% | 5.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 32.2% |
Range | 98.2% | 26.6% |
Mean | 25.7% | 16.8% |
Median | 19.7% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 13.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 21.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.5% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.9% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Israelis by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.24%), South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Chilean (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |