Immigrants from Australia vs Asian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Asian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Asians
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Asian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,116,794 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,886,989 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.461 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Asian |
Minimum | 0.92% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 48.6% | 21.9% |
Range | 47.6% | 20.0% |
Mean | 13.4% | 10.3% |
Median | 10.3% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia and Asians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Scandinavian (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |