Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Panama
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Panama
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,145,499 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,710,626 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 0.17%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Panama | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
Minimum | 3.0% | 0.21% |
Maximum | 30.5% | 37.5% |
Range | 27.5% | 37.3% |
Mean | 14.5% | 13.7% |
Median | 13.7% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |