Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Jordan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Immigrants from Jordan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Immigrants from Jordan
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Jordan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,660,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,199,618 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 3.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 2.0% | 0.79% |
Maximum | 30.2% | 38.9% |
Range | 28.1% | 38.1% |
Mean | 11.2% | 9.3% |
Median | 8.7% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 10.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Jordan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |