Chilean vs Immigrants from Jordan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chilean
Immigrants from Jordan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chileans
Immigrants from Jordan
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Immigrants from Jordan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,264,406 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,199,618 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 0.97%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.79% |
Maximum | 19.1% | 38.9% |
Range | 18.1% | 38.1% |
Mean | 8.0% | 9.3% |
Median | 7.9% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 10.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Immigrants from Jordan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Sri Lankan (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |