Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Immigrants from Bolivia Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Immigrants from Bolivia
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Immigrants from Bolivia
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Immigrants from Bolivia Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,289,354 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.300 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,688,041 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 0.50%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from North Macedonia | Immigrants from Bolivia |
| Minimum | 0.15% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 17.7% | 22.9% |
| Range | 17.6% | 20.9% |
| Mean | 7.9% | 8.3% |
| Median | 8.0% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia and Immigrants from Bolivia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia are Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.69%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (9.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |