Immigrants from North America vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,303,762 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 33.7%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from North America	Chickasaw
Minimum	8.1%	3.3%
Maximum	72.9%	100.0%
Range	64.8%	96.7%
Mean	23.4%	27.0%
Median	19.1%	23.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.6%	18.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	29.3%	30.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	17.7%	11.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	16.2%	15.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	15.9%	15.4%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Northern European (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), German (14.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Argentina (14.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Austrian (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Taiwanese (14.8%, a difference of 0.13%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Immigrants \| Canada	97.6 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 14.7%
Ukrainians	97.6 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 14.7%
Immigrants \| South Africa	97.4 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 14.8%
Swiss	97.3 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 14.8%
Taiwanese	97.3 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 14.8%
Germans	97.2 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 14.8%
Northern Europeans	97.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| North America	97.1 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| Argentina	97.1 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 14.8%
Austrians	97.1 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 14.8%
Paraguayans	96.8 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 14.9%
Argentineans	96.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 14.9%
Sri Lankans	96.7 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Italy	96.7 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 14.9%
Finns	96.5 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 14.9%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Iroquois	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.6%
Guyanese	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.6%
Vietnamese	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.6%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.7%
Cherokee	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 19.7%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 19.8%
Belizeans	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 19.9%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #274	Tragic 19.9%
Jamaicans	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 20.0%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 20.0%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.0 /100 \| #277	Tragic 20.0%
Immigrants \| West Indies	0.0 /100 \| #278	Tragic 20.0%