Belizean vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Belizean
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Belizeans
Chickasaw
19.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Belizean vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,705,022 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Belizeans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 0.36%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Belizean | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 47.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 45.9% | 96.7% |
| Mean | 20.6% | 27.0% |
| Median | 19.5% | 23.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 30.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 15.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Belizeans and Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Belizeans are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Subsaharan African (20.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and Immigrants from Barbados (20.0%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (19.7%, a difference of 0.78%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.1% |