Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,658,821 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 42.8%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Sri Lanka	Chickasaw
Minimum	0.42%	3.3%
Maximum	58.8%	100.0%
Range	58.4%	96.7%
Mean	16.1%	27.0%
Median	11.5%	23.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.3%	18.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.9%	30.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.6%	11.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.8%	15.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.7%	15.4%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Australia (13.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Luxembourger (13.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and Lithuanian (14.0%, a difference of 0.61%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Swedes	99.8 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.6%
Turks	99.8 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.6%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.6%
Danes	99.8 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 13.6%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.8 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 13.6%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 13.8%
Luxembourgers	99.7 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 13.8%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.6 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.6 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.6 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.6 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 13.9%
Lithuanians	99.6 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 14.0%
Koreans	99.6 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 14.0%
Croatians	99.5 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 14.0%
Estonians	99.4 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 14.1%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Iroquois	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.6%
Guyanese	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.6%
Vietnamese	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.6%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.7%
Cherokee	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 19.7%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 19.8%
Belizeans	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 19.9%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #274	Tragic 19.9%
Jamaicans	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 20.0%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 20.0%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.0 /100 \| #277	Tragic 20.0%
Immigrants \| West Indies	0.0 /100 \| #278	Tragic 20.0%