Immigrants from North America vs Serbian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,303,762 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,748,099 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 1.7%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from North America	Serbian
Minimum	8.1%	3.7%
Maximum	72.9%	100.0%
Range	64.8%	96.3%
Mean	23.4%	19.9%
Median	19.1%	14.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.6%	11.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	29.3%	19.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	17.7%	7.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	16.2%	17.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	15.9%	17.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America and Serbians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Northern European (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Argentina (14.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Austrian (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Paraguayan (14.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Argentinean (14.9%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Jordanian (15.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Dutch (15.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (15.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Denmark (15.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Northern Europeans	97.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| North America	97.1 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| Argentina	97.1 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 14.8%
Austrians	97.1 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 14.8%
Paraguayans	96.8 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 14.9%
Argentineans	96.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 14.9%
Sri Lankans	96.7 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Italy	96.7 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 14.9%
Finns	96.5 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	96.3 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Egypt	96.2 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 14.9%
British	96.2 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| France	96.1 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 15.0%
Chileans	95.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Belarus	95.7 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 15.0%
Romanians	95.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Denmark	95.6 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	95.4 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 15.0%
Dutch	95.4 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 15.0%
Serbians	95.2 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 15.1%
Jordanians	95.1 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 15.1%