Immigrants from Moldova vs Bhutanese Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,926,659 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and unemployment rate among youth under the age of 25 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.233 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,134,198 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and unemployment rate among youth under the age of 25 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.040%.

Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Moldova	Bhutanese
Minimum	5.1%	2.0%
Maximum	17.0%	51.1%
Range	11.9%	49.1%
Mean	10.9%	12.4%
Median	11.1%	11.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.2%	9.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.2%	14.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.0%	5.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.5%	7.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.5%	7.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Moldova and Bhutanese by Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years

In terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Slavic (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kenya (11.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Chickasaw (11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Macedonian (11.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Australia (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Slavic (11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Australia (11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Kenya (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Creek (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and New Zealander (11.2%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years
South Africans	98.5 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 11.1%
Filipinos	98.3 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 11.1%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	98.1 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 11.1%
Immigrants \| Croatia	98.1 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 11.1%
Jordanians	97.9 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 11.1%
Immigrants \| Singapore	97.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 11.2%
Macedonians	97.7 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 11.2%
Chickasaw	97.7 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Kenya	97.6 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Moldova	97.5 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 11.2%
Slavs	97.5 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 11.2%
Bhutanese	97.4 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Australia	97.3 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 11.2%
Creek	97.2 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 11.2%
New Zealanders	97.2 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 11.2%
French	97.1 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 11.2%
German Russians	97.0 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 11.2%
Whites/Caucasians	96.9 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	96.7 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Canada	96.7 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	96.4 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 11.2%