Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from China
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from China
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,846,172 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,907,220 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 1.7%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from England | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 44.4% | 22.2% |
Range | 42.8% | 21.2% |
Mean | 11.1% | 7.5% |
Median | 9.0% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Immigrants from China by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from Denmark (8.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Serbian (8.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Scottish (7.9%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Austrian (7.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Romania (7.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Croatia (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Latvia (7.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and Ukrainian (7.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 98.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |