Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Italy Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from Italy
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from Italy
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Italy Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,846,172 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,411,315 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 0.16%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from England | Immigrants from Italy |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 44.4% | 22.9% |
| Range | 42.8% | 20.5% |
| Mean | 11.1% | 9.2% |
| Median | 9.0% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Italy by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from Denmark (8.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Serbian (8.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Scottish (7.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Asia (7.9%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from Denmark (8.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Serbian (8.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |