Immigrants from Ecuador vs Czech Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Czech
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Czechs
19.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Czech Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,531,400 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,185,036 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 36.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Czech |
Minimum | 5.9% | 0.95% |
Maximum | 43.2% | 36.4% |
Range | 37.3% | 35.4% |
Mean | 19.0% | 14.7% |
Median | 17.6% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.8% | 18.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 7.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Guyana (19.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (19.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (19.2%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (14.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Greece (14.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |