Bahamian vs Czech Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Bahamian
Czech
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Bahamians
Czechs
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bahamian vs Czech Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,230,228 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.551 and weighted average of 21.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,185,036 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 52.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bahamian | Czech |
Minimum | 4.6% | 0.95% |
Maximum | 82.1% | 36.4% |
Range | 77.5% | 35.4% |
Mean | 28.7% | 14.7% |
Median | 21.4% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.0% | 18.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.8% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.7% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.5% | 7.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Bahamians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Houma (21.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Bahamas (21.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Central America (21.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (14.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Greece (14.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |