Immigrants from Ecuador vs Bangladeshi Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,531,400 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,467,619 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 3.6%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Ecuador	Bangladeshi
Minimum	5.9%	0.72%
Maximum	43.2%	54.5%
Range	37.3%	53.8%
Mean	19.0%	22.6%
Median	17.6%	20.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.4%	14.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	22.8%	29.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.4%	14.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.5%	11.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.4%	11.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Bangladeshis by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Guyanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Salvadoran (19.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and Ottawa (19.4%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from El Salvador (20.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Barbados (19.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Cherokee (19.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (20.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Liberian (19.9%, a difference of 0.60%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.3 /100 \| #254	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.9%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.9%
Cherokee	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 19.9%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 19.9%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 20.0%
Bangladeshis	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 20.0%
Immigrants \| St. Vincent and the Grenadines	0.0 /100 \| #274	Tragic 20.1%