Luxembourger vs Czech Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Czech
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Luxembourgers
Czechs
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Czech Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,903,603 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,185,036 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 0.87%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Czech |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 36.4% |
| Range | 32.0% | 35.4% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 14.7% |
| Median | 11.6% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Czechs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Italian (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (14.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Greece (14.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |