Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Japanese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Japanese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Japanese
9.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
15.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
4.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Japanese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,301,294 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.724 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,852,848 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 3.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Japanese |
| Minimum | 5.3% | 0.66% |
| Maximum | 42.2% | 45.9% |
| Range | 36.8% | 45.3% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 14.7% |
| Median | 9.4% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Japanese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa are Sierra Leonean (9.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Uruguay (9.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from South America (9.5%, a difference of 0.64%), Aleut (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and Alsatian (9.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Cambodia (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Africa (9.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Bermudan (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Eritrea (9.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Panamanian (9.8%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Aleuts | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
| Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |