Immigrants from China vs Tsimshian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Tsimshian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Tsimshian
11.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Tsimshian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 395,740,575 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,184,225 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 2.7%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.66% |
| Maximum | 20.6% | 35.0% |
| Range | 18.8% | 34.3% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 14.1% |
| Median | 10.5% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 20.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 14.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Tsimshian by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Iranian (11.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Iran (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Bhutanese (11.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.72%), Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |