Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Latvia Single Father Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 348,182,579 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,106,099 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.331 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 5.6%.

In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Malaysian (14.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Bhutanese (15.0%, a difference of 0.21%).

In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Bulgarian (15.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Danish (15.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Argentinean (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Africa (15.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and Turkish (15.8%, a difference of 0.090%).