Immigrants from China vs Thai Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Thai
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Thais
11.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Thai Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 395,740,575 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 412,300,186 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 5.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Thai |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 20.6% | 31.0% |
| Range | 18.8% | 30.6% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 9.7% |
| Median | 10.5% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Thais by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Japan (11.3%, a difference of 0.71%), Maltese (11.3%, a difference of 1.0%), Indian (Asian) (11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Afghan (10.7%, a difference of 0.47%), Taiwanese (10.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |