Icelander vs Immigrants from Vietnam Male Poverty
COMPARE
Icelander
Immigrants from Vietnam
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Icelanders
Immigrants from Vietnam
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Immigrants from Vietnam Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,599,836 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,476,385 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.489 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 2.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Icelander | Immigrants from Vietnam |
| Minimum | 0.64% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 57.1% | 63.3% |
| Range | 56.5% | 59.4% |
| Mean | 12.2% | 12.6% |
| Median | 10.3% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Immigrants from Vietnam by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Syrian (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and Samoan (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Vietnam are Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |