Icelander vs Hungarian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Icelander
Hungarian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Icelanders
Hungarians
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
55.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Hungarian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,599,836 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,483,073 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 1.4%.
![Icelander vs Hungarian Male Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/male-poverty/icelanders-vs-hungarians-male-poverty-chart.webp)
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Icelander | Hungarian |
Minimum | 0.64% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 57.1% | 67.8% |
Range | 56.5% | 66.6% |
Mean | 12.2% | 17.3% |
Median | 10.3% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 23.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 15.3% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Hungarians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Albania (11.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Ethiopian (11.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |