Icelander vs South African Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Icelander
South African
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Icelanders
South Africans
15.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
87.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
93.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs South African Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,023,783 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.726 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,617,887 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 1.9%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Icelander | South African |
Minimum | 3.9% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 34.6% |
Range | 96.1% | 32.6% |
Mean | 27.6% | 13.6% |
Median | 18.9% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.2% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.0% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.8% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.8% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.2% | 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and South Africans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Portuguese (15.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (15.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Peruvian (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Welsh (15.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.6%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Scottish (15.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Native Hawaiian (15.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 88.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.5% |
Welsh | 88.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.5% |
Peruvians | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Portuguese | 87.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Icelanders | 87.5 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Spain | 87.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.6% |