Guatemalan vs British West Indian Poverty
COMPARE
Guatemalan
British West Indian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Guatemalans
British West Indians
15.3%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs British West Indian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,295,647 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,630,673 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 3.9%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | British West Indian |
Minimum | 4.4% | 0.13% |
Maximum | 62.9% | 32.9% |
Range | 58.5% | 32.8% |
Mean | 20.4% | 13.5% |
Median | 18.3% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.5% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.5% | 16.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and British West Indians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Hispanic or Latino (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Senegal (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Senegalese (15.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Central America (15.4%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Somalia (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Grenada (15.8%, a difference of 0.49%), Cajun (15.7%, a difference of 0.93%), Chippewa (15.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and Dutch West Indian (15.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 15.3% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 15.3% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 15.4% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.4% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.6% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.8% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.9% |