Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Oceania Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,488,068 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.489 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,361,436 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 0.23%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Guamanian/Chamorro	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	1.0%	2.1%
Maximum	66.7%	53.8%
Range	65.6%	51.7%
Mean	20.1%	19.1%
Median	14.9%	16.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.0%	12.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	22.4%	21.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.3%	8.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	15.8%	12.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	15.6%	12.3%

Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Immigrants from Oceania by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Costa Rican (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Albania (16.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (16.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Colombian (16.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.75%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Northern Africa (16.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Costa Rican (16.1%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Albania (16.1%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Yugoslavian (15.9%, a difference of 0.69%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Puget Sound Salish	79.8 /100 \| #151	Good 15.8%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	79.5 /100 \| #152	Good 15.8%
French	78.7 /100 \| #153	Good 15.8%
Syrians	77.5 /100 \| #154	Good 15.9%
French Canadians	76.6 /100 \| #155	Good 15.9%
Israelis	76.5 /100 \| #156	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Nepal	76.0 /100 \| #157	Good 15.9%
Yugoslavians	75.9 /100 \| #158	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Chile	74.8 /100 \| #159	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	71.3 /100 \| #160	Good 16.0%
Immigrants \| Oceania	71.3 /100 \| #161	Good 16.0%
Guamanians/Chamorros	69.6 /100 \| #162	Good 16.1%
Costa Ricans	68.1 /100 \| #163	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Albania	67.9 /100 \| #164	Good 16.1%
Colombians	65.2 /100 \| #165	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	63.6 /100 \| #166	Good 16.2%
Afghans	55.4 /100 \| #167	Average 16.3%
South Americans	55.3 /100 \| #168	Average 16.3%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	53.6 /100 \| #169	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	51.7 /100 \| #170	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	51.3 /100 \| #171	Average 16.4%