Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Oceania Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,179,374 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.789 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,303,395 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 0.13%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Guamanian/Chamorro	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	2.2%	1.6%
Maximum	100.0%	45.2%
Range	97.8%	43.6%
Mean	22.7%	18.8%
Median	15.3%	17.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.1%	12.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	23.9%	23.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.7%	11.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	20.6%	10.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	20.3%	10.4%

Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Immigrants from Oceania by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Germany (15.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Colombian (15.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Yugoslavian (15.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (15.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Germany (15.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Colombian (15.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Yugoslavian (15.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and Costa Rican (16.0%, a difference of 0.57%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Syrians	76.1 /100 \| #155	Good 15.6%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	74.9 /100 \| #156	Good 15.7%
Immigrants \| Nepal	72.9 /100 \| #157	Good 15.7%
Immigrants \| Chile	72.8 /100 \| #158	Good 15.7%
Immigrants \| Fiji	71.1 /100 \| #159	Good 15.8%
Immigrants \| Albania	70.7 /100 \| #160	Good 15.8%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	68.1 /100 \| #161	Good 15.8%
Colombians	67.6 /100 \| #162	Good 15.8%
Yugoslavians	67.6 /100 \| #163	Good 15.8%
Immigrants \| Germany	67.3 /100 \| #164	Good 15.8%
Guamanians/Chamorros	66.4 /100 \| #165	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Oceania	65.4 /100 \| #166	Good 15.9%
Costa Ricans	61.1 /100 \| #167	Good 16.0%
South Americans	57.9 /100 \| #168	Average 16.0%
Uruguayans	54.7 /100 \| #169	Average 16.1%
Immigrants \| Colombia	54.4 /100 \| #170	Average 16.1%
Hungarians	52.5 /100 \| #171	Average 16.2%
Afghans	52.3 /100 \| #172	Average 16.2%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	52.1 /100 \| #173	Average 16.2%
Whites/Caucasians	50.0 /100 \| #174	Average 16.2%
Scotch-Irish	47.1 /100 \| #175	Average 16.3%