Filipino vs Portuguese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Filipino
Portuguese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Filipinos
Portuguese
17.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
81.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Portuguese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,336,668 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,230,754 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212 and weighted average of 20.5%, a difference of 20.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | Portuguese |
| Minimum | 5.2% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 43.4% | 50.5% |
| Range | 38.2% | 49.2% |
| Mean | 15.8% | 23.2% |
| Median | 14.3% | 22.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 27.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Filipinos by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 1.0%), Thai (17.3%, a difference of 1.7%), Immigrants from Iran (17.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from Denmark (20.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |