Filipino vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty
COMPARE
Filipino
Immigrants from Lithuania
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Filipinos
Immigrants from Lithuania
10.1%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,160,394 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,712,051 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 2.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | Immigrants from Lithuania |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 19.2% | 18.3% |
| Range | 17.6% | 16.4% |
| Mean | 8.1% | 7.7% |
| Median | 8.4% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Immigrants from Lithuania by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Maltese (10.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and Bulgarian (10.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.4%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Bolivia (10.4%, a difference of 0.89%), Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bulgarian (10.2%, a difference of 0.99%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |