Norwegian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
 Immigrants from Lithuania
 Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Immigrants from Lithuania
10.5%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,786,336 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,712,051 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 1.6%.
 
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Norwegian | Immigrants from Lithuania | 
| Minimum | 0.40% | 2.0% | 
| Maximum | 41.5% | 18.3% | 
| Range | 41.1% | 16.4% | 
| Mean | 10.4% | 7.7% | 
| Median | 9.8% | 7.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 4.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 9.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 5.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 3.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 3.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Immigrants from Lithuania by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Latvian (10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Lithuanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.6%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.4%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Bolivia (10.4%, a difference of 0.89%), Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bulgarian (10.2%, a difference of 0.99%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4  | Exceptional 9.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5  | Exceptional 10.1%  | 
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6  | Exceptional 10.1%  | 
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7  | Exceptional 10.1%  | 
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8  | Exceptional 10.2%  | 
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9  | Exceptional 10.2%  | 
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10  | Exceptional 10.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11  | Exceptional 10.3%  | 
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24  | Exceptional 10.6%  |