Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Guatemala Female Poverty
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Immigrants from Guatemala
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Immigrants from Guatemala
19.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Guatemala Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,476,258 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.642 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,104,369 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 12.9%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Minimum | 2.3% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 50.5% | 65.8% |
Range | 48.2% | 61.2% |
Mean | 25.5% | 22.1% |
Median | 23.5% | 20.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.8% | 24.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans and Immigrants from Guatemala by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 3.2%), Black/African American (18.6%, a difference of 3.3%), Yakama (18.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and Central American Indian (18.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.090%), British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.42%), U.S. Virgin Islander (17.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |