Delaware vs Hawaiian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Delaware
Hawaiian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Delaware
Hawaiians
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
73.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
62.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Delaware vs Hawaiian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,946,385 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Delaware and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.446 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,605,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Delaware | Hawaiian |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 28.8% | 27.3% |
| Range | 27.9% | 26.0% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 6.1% |
| Median | 5.6% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Delaware and Hawaiians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Delaware are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Sri Lankan (5.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.0%, a difference of 0.43%), Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Paraguayan (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Costa Rican (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Sierra Leonean (5.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
| Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
| Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
| Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
| Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
| Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
| Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
| Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |