Czechoslovakian vs Albanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Albanian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Albanians
15.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Albanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,103,905 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,280,277 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Albanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.472 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 0.50%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Albanian |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 57.5% | 22.2% |
| Range | 54.2% | 20.8% |
| Mean | 21.9% | 11.4% |
| Median | 17.6% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 14.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.1% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.6% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Albanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Native Hawaiian (15.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (15.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Brazilian (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (15.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (15.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Scottish (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Puget Sound Salish (15.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
| South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
| New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |