Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Immigrants from Micronesia
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Immigrants from Micronesia
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
1.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,828,483 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,290,539 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Minimum | 8.6% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 80.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 71.4% | 97.0% |
Mean | 29.8% | 27.8% |
Median | 22.7% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.1% | 45.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.9% | 32.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.8% | 23.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 23.5% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Immigrants from Micronesia by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Luxembourger (13.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and Belizean (13.4%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Belgian (13.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (13.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Spanish (13.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Somalia (13.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 1.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 13.5% |
Belgians | 1.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 13.5% |
Czechs | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 13.5% |
Spanish | 1.0 /100 | #249 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 13.6% |
Finns | 0.9 /100 | #252 | Tragic 13.6% |