Czechoslovakian vs British West Indian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
British West Indian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
British West Indians
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs British West Indian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,828,483 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,852,012 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 0.18%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | British West Indian |
Minimum | 8.6% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 80.0% | 38.5% |
Range | 71.4% | 35.3% |
Mean | 29.8% | 14.6% |
Median | 22.7% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.1% | 17.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.9% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.8% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and British West Indians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Luxembourger (13.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Belizean (13.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and British (13.3%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Luxembourger (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.11%), British (13.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Canadian (13.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Lebanese | 6.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.2% |
Europeans | 6.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.3% |
Ghanaians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.3% |
Slavs | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 1.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 13.5% |
Belgians | 1.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 13.5% |
Czechs | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 13.5% |