Czechoslovakian vs Central American Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Central American
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Central Americans
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
10.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Central American Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,828,483 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 436,047,555 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 1.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Central American |
| Minimum | 8.6% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 80.0% | 47.8% |
| Range | 71.4% | 44.7% |
| Mean | 29.8% | 14.5% |
| Median | 22.7% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.1% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.9% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.8% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Central Americans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Luxembourger (13.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and British (13.3%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are New Zealander (13.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (13.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from the Azores (13.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Somali (13.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 12.6 /100 | #219 | Poor 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 10.9 /100 | #220 | Poor 13.2% |
| New Zealanders | 10.7 /100 | #221 | Poor 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 10.0 /100 | #222 | Poor 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 9.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Somalis | 9.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 8.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 7.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Haitians | 7.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Lebanese | 6.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Europeans | 6.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Ghanaians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Slavs | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
| British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
| British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |