Czechoslovakian vs Iroquois Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Iroquois
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Iroquois
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Iroquois Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,828,483 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,366,104 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.252 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 8.2%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 8.6% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 80.0% | 63.0% |
| Range | 71.4% | 60.6% |
| Mean | 29.8% | 23.0% |
| Median | 22.7% | 19.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.1% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.9% | 20.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.8% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 14.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Luxembourger (13.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and Belizean (13.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
| British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
| British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 1.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are White/Caucasian (14.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Celtic (14.5%, a difference of 0.13%), U.S. Virgin Islander (14.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and French (14.4%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 14.4% |
| French | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 14.5% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 14.6% |
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 14.6% |