Crow vs Romanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Crow
Romanian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Crow
Romanians
26.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Romanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,004,604 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 26.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 369,938,935 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 75.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow | Romanian |
| Minimum | 5.8% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 67.4% | 70.0% |
| Range | 61.6% | 66.0% |
| Mean | 32.7% | 23.0% |
| Median | 27.9% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.2% | 28.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.5% | 17.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.9% | 19.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.6% | 19.0% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Crow by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 0.34%), Yup'ik (25.8%, a difference of 2.1%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 2.7%), Sioux (25.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and Pueblo (25.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Chilean (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), British (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from South Africa (15.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Basques | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |